Well to add to the confusion and general information here is Yet Another Rolling Review of the new Fujifilm X-T1 mirrorless interchangeable lens camera. I decided to write up a few of my initial observations and why I wanted to get this camera. I have been using the X-Pro 1 since shortly after it came out in 2012. A great small lightweight, easy to carry, all day type of camera. I got it to supplement my dslr. Something handy to carry, you know the camera you have with you is the one you are going to use most often. It was never a replacement for my dslr, but it is damn close.
The X-Pro1 has a great feel to it, I enjoyed the freedom from carrying a heavy camera. The Fuji lenses are some of the best around, the price reasonable. So what was not to like? Since it was a retro styled camera, it was truly retro, there was no ability to use an electronic release, something I often use in landscapes and long exposure photography, it had a threaded shutter button like my old film cameras. It used a mechanical release. While that would work, I like using a soft release so that meant unscrewing one and using the other and then possibly losing the soft release later. Fuji later released the X-E1 and X-E2 cameras and they appealed to me but did not fit as well in my hand and they had my missing release capability. I was ready to pull the trigger on the new X-E2…… and then they announced the X-T1. Oh this was nirvana, true bliss and a bad case of G.A.S. developed. I wanted it. I read everything I could, followed the rumors and waited, not patiently, to pre-order. That day finally happened at the end of January of this year. About a month later the wait was over… it arrived!
So what was gained with this new addition.
1. The EVF, larger, better, faster and very usable. The X-Pro1 had the nice switchable hybrid viewfinder, I could switch from optical to electronic with the flip of a lever. I had pretty much used the optical initially but after time I wanted a better and more accurate framing in most circumstances, so I was mostly using the EVF on the X-Pro1. Also with longer focal length lenses the optical viewfinder just did not cut it. The X-T1 has a much better EVF. A very big difference.
2. Focusing, the X-T1 uses both phase detect and contrast detect methods. The X-Pro1 used only contrast as it lacked the phase detect pixels. This faster autofocus is nice in some circumstances but it was not a “have to have”. I think people on the forums rant and rave about autofocus speed way too much. People used fully manual focus lenses for a long time and were able to capture action, wildlife, you name it. I think this is more of an issue because of modern society puts more emphasis that everything needs to be “now”. Instant gratification, instant delivery. While nice, not critical for me. So just as accurate as before but faster.
3. Ability to use an electronic release, very nice for me. Intervalometer here I come… Also a really nice feature is that there is a built in native intervalometer in the camera! Bonus! Best of both worlds. Timelapse waiting to happen.
4. Faster recording of data to the card and faster frame rate for rapid exposures. Not a mandatory feature but a plus for those times it is needed. Also raw files are 14bit while with the X-Pro1 are 12 bit, that means there might be a difference at extremes for capturing more dynamic range. Might not see it in day to day use.
5. Ergonomics. This is more personal, but I like the layout of the buttons, much better for easy functionality. Dials that are easy to set and see. The grip is very nice and comfortable. I was worried that it would be too small as it is slightly smaller than the X-Pro1, nothing to worry about. I thought I would have to have the battery grip for it to be comfortable, but that is not the case at all. Having six function keys that are user configurable is wonderful. The screen tilts, this was not high on my list of features but it is useful. There has been some flak on the net about the directional buttons being too flush, yes they are different and quite flush. Yes they did feel odd at first, but after some use, it is easy to find them and the muscle memory is slowly adapting. So a definite plus in usability.
Like any product, it is not perfect. Nothing is, we just need to adapt, makes life interesting. None of these issues are deal breakers for me.
A. Exposure bracketing. This has been an issue since the X-pro1. The camera only allows +/- 1 EV automatic bracketing. This is just not enough, in my opinion. I would like to see a minimum of +/-2 stops but better yet would be +/- 3 stops or programmable range. And the ability to set the step size and the number of images per bracket.
B. I would like to see the histogram remain live and usable when the shutter is half pressed. Metering should not stop.
C. Tethering capability. I would love to see the ability to tether and have complete control over the camera from a computer. The wifi app for the X-T1 is very limited. Full tethering would be a great feature. It would also allow the user to control bracketing, exposure, and do bulb ramping etc.
I am sure there are other things that I will find over time, but then nothing is perfect. The camera is just a tool, and as a tool this is a very usable camera. Form, fit and function. Will it make me a better photographer? No, but any camera that is a pleasure to use will get used more often, and as we all know, practice makes perfect.
2 Comments
Hi Alan,
Thanks for posting your extensive comments about the X-Pro1 and X-T1. I concur with your views and experience with the X-Pro1. I’ll be purchasing an X-T1 from my local dealer shortly. Just possibly, when the Fuji release their new lenses next year, I’ll be getting rid ob my Canon gear. My rucksack has simply become too heavy!
One important feature (important to me) is missing on Fuji’s 60mm macro lens – the tripod mount. I’m less concerned with weight distribution but find the ability to quickly rotation from hozizontal to vertical (or vice-versa) absolutely necessary on a macro lens. I often show both aspects on the same subject and find it very anoying to have to re-frame. Such a simple but major feature! That’s why I never bought the (aparently fantastic) Zeiss 100mm macro for my Canon.
As you had mentioned, nothing is perfect. But I see so many nice lenses being produced my Fuji, Olympus, Panasonic, etc. but a Tripod mount only seems necessary on their long telephotos. Don’t people photograph macros as much as I do? Don’t people want to ease their technique and reap more enjoyment from the photographic experience? Sure, it the final image that counts but there’s nothing wrong with enjoying the activity of photography (a bit more).
Your comments about the Fuji’s X system have been very helpful and I look forward to reading your future blogs. Thanks, Alan and all the best!
Kind regards from Germany (expat from Colorado),
Mike
Many thanks for the comments Mike. The Fuji is a wonderful camera and when they come out with a long telephoto I think my Canon system will go. I just got back from a week long trip to the San Juans for fall color. I took my Fuji cameras, and lenses and my Sigma DP2Q and DP3M and left the big dslr at home. Did not miss the Canon system at all, really pleased with how the XT-1 handled, images are fantastic and now just to get through in processing.
For macro work I have been using the Really Right Stuff l-plate on my XT-1, a nice high quality place, along with a slider to you really need rings on the lenses, except maybe for the telephotos. The L-plate is fast to change the orientation, but I do agree not as easy as a ring. Not sure there is really any room for a ring on some of the Fuji lenses. That being said my favorite macro setup is a Raynox DCR 5320 Pro on the Fuji 55-200mm, gives you lots of working room and great image quality. I guess I should really do an article on it…..
Thanks again and best to you.
Alan
One Trackback
[…] – “Well to add to the confusion and general information here is Yet Another Rolling Review of the new Fujifilm X-T1 mirrorless interchangeable lens camera. I decided to write up a few of my initial observations and why I wanted to get this camera.” Read more at aps-photo here. […]